Investigation of in vivo and in vitro fertilization methods: a review of the literature
José Guedes da Silva Júnior, Daniel José da Silva, João Ricardhis Saturnino de Oliveira, Weber Melo do Nascimento, Maria Auxiliadora Macêdo Callou, Talyta Valéria Siqueira do Monte
Abstract
Objectives: This is a review of the methods of assisted reproduction, in vivo and in vitro fertilization, and its applications. Methods: The aforementioned information was compiled through a review of the literature on articles, books and periodicals about Intrauterine Transfer (IT), In Vitro Fertilization (IVF), Intracytoplasmic Injection (ICSI), Gamete Intrafallopian Transfer (GIFT), and ZygoteIntrafallopian Transfer (ZIFT). Results: The exacerbated use of these techniques brought peculiar attention on the subject although population was discordant about its use. This formed non-veridical opinions regarding the process. Manipulation of these therapies has been controlled and enacted by laws, legislations, and resolutions by each country politics, yet these techniques are well sought and present satisfactory results. Conclusions: Assisted human reproduction gives hope and brings greater understanding and confidence to those who are facing problems to build a family. The search for specialized clinics has become more frequent for those who wish to have children and are not limited to this, it has the possibility to deviate from hereditary genetic problems, since it contributes as an improvement in the health of a new generation.
Keywords
References
1. Moura MD, Souza MCB, Sheffer BB. Reprodução assistida. Um pouco de história. Rev SBPH (Belo Horizonte). 2009;12:23-42.
2. Pádua ARM. Responsabilidade civil na reprodução assistida. Rio de Janeiro: Lumem Juris; 2008. p. 56.
3. Gabiatti JRE, Faúndes A, Bahamondes L, Faúndes D, Ramos M, Fazano F. A experiência de iniciar um programa de fertilização in vitro em Hospital Universitário. ReprodClim. 1998;13:221-7.
4. Freitas M, Siqueira AAFA, Segre CAM. Avanços em reprodução assistida. Rev Bras Crescimento Desenvolv Hum, 2008;18(1):93-7.
5. Souza MC. As técnicas de reprodução assistida. A barriga de aluguel. A definição da maternidade e da paternidade. Bioética. Revista da EMERJ. 2010;13:348-67.
6. Diniz MH. O estado atual do biodireito. Saraiva. 2011;37:1025.
7. Duran HE, Morshedi M, Kruger T, Oehninger S. Intrauterine insemination: a systematic review on determinants of success. Hum Reprod Update. 2002;8(4):373-84. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humupd/8.4.373. PMid:12206471.
8. Yavuz A, Demirci O, Sözen H, Uludoğan M. Predictive factors influencing pregnancy rates after intrauterine insemination. Iran J Reprod Med. 2013;11(3):227-34. PMid:24639750.
9. Eshre Capri Workshop Group. Intrauterine insemination. Hum Reprod Update. 2009;15(3):265-77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmp003.
10. Nuojua-Huttunen S, Tomas C, Bloigu R, Tuomivaara L, Martikainen H. Intrauterine insemination treatment in subfertility: an analysis of factors affecting outcome. Hum Reprod. 1999;14(3):698-703. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/14.3.698. PMid:10221698.
11. Villasante A, Pacheco A, Ruiz A, Pellicer A, Garcia-Velasco JA. Vascular endothelial cadherin regulates vascular permeability: implications for ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007;92(1):314-21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1210/jc.2006-1231. PMid:17032719.
12. Abu-Hassan D, Al-Hasani S. The use of ICSI for all cases of in-vitro conception. Hum Reprod. 2003;18(4):893-4, author reply 894-5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deg159. PMid:12660298.
13. Van Voorhis BJ. Outcomes from assisted reproductive technology. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;107(1):183-98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01. AOG.0000194207.06554.5b. PMid:16394060.
14. Palermo G, Joris H, Devroey P, Van Steirteghem AC. Pregnancies after intracytoplasmic injection of a single spermatozoon into a oocyte. Lancet. 1992;340(8810):17-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0140-6736(92)92425-F. PMid:1351601.
15. Nagy Z, Liu J, Cecile J, Silber S, Devroey P, Van Steirteghem A. Using ejaculated, fresh, and frozen-thawed epididymal and testicular spermatozoa gives rise to comparable results after intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Fertil Steril. 1995;63(4):808-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(16)57486-X. PMid:7890067.
16. Dubey AK, Penzias AS, Emmi AE, Layman LC, Reindollar RH, Ducibella T. Failed fertilization after intracytoplasmic sperm injection: the extent of paternal and maternal chromatin decondesation. Fertil Steril. 1997;68(4):714-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(97)00313-0. PMid:9341616.
17. Abyholm T, Tanbo T. GIFT, ZIFT, and related techniques. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 1993;5(5):615-22.
Submitted date:
12/13/2017
Accepted date:
09/19/2019
Facebook
Google+
Twitter
LinkedIn
Mendeley
StumbleUpon
CiteULike
Reddit
Email